Specify Books In Pursuance Of The Coming Insurrection

Edition Language: English
Books Free The Coming Insurrection Download Online
The Coming Insurrection ebook | Pages: 236 pages
Rating: 3.76 | 2311 Users | 220 Reviews

Particularize Containing Books The Coming Insurrection

Title:The Coming Insurrection
Author:Comité invisible
Book Format:ebook
Book Edition:First Edition
Pages:Pages: 236 pages
Published: (first published 2007)
Categories:Politics. Nonfiction. Philosophy. Theory. Cultural. France. History. Writing. Essays

Explanation To Books The Coming Insurrection

Five fucking stars. With reservations.

This book says some very unpopular things that happen to be very true. You will most likely disagree with me on this. The book is essentially a stituationist manifesto for the present day. It's a book that has seen the bullshit that the sixties produced, the harmless liberalism, snide little self-righteous products like Adbusters, feel good community programs where priveleged suburbanites descend upon poor neighborhoods and enlighten the savages in some kind of neo-liberalism colonization hegemony invasion, where minority rights has basically been more hegemonic bullshit that just means more of the worst white males represent in the world, but now being diffused to people with different skin colors and who are forced to pee sitting down, a world where the asthectics of discontent is now high art that can sit on a Park Ave coffee table, a la Bansky; and on and on. What all of these things have in common is that they are all safety valves of the 'system', the 'spectacle' or whatever catchy word one wants to use. This book basically says fuck all of that. Fuck community organizing, voting, buying enviornmentally aware organic grocery's, fuck all of it because getting really into anything like that is only returning one to the role of a consumer, a spectator, a cog? of the system that is so beyond fucked that now it expects part of the population to make things right again.

And most of the population would love to step into that role, buy some recyclable bags, go to Green Markets, organizing some DIY workshop in a bad neighborhood, extol the virtues of riding a bike to your graphic design job instead of using public transportation and pray (or hope really hard) that things will get better; that Obama will save the day, that politics will miraculously change in a way that it never has in the past, and that everything will be better.

I'm sounding much more cynical than I probably really am. The problems facing the world scare the shit out of me, but I don't believe in the idea that government will fix it, and I know that companies won't (no matter how green they are according to this weeks Newsweek). Why do I know this to be true? Why don't I believe that deep down Obama will be no better than any other president we've had, and that things will be just as fucked when the next asshole takes office? Because the whole system is held together by a collective delusion stronger than anything else ever. Flat-Earth Creationists believe in something more credible than the economy that our entire existence is based on (ok maybe not, but if not then they are equal in the nothingness lurking right behind their beliefs). You can't fix the economy, you can only induce the collective idea that things are now getting better. That the pieces of paper with nothing backing them up are now worth something more so we should spend more of them, etc., etc.,.

I'm going all over the place here. Should I admit that I don't believe in government, or organizations for that matter? That I don't like leaders, I have no desire to lead, or be led? That I find myself to be mature enough to think for myself, and that potentially we all have that ability, and that if we all just matured in our thinking we could stop being assholes and be civilized to one another without the threat of coercion? Am I an anomaly that I don't feel an urge to go out and rape, kill and pillage, and that the only thing holding me back is the legality involved in it? Now this is basically the idea of anarchism, which is a much derided idea, and one that when I say I don't like being told what to do I'm usually treated like an angry teenager stuck in a punk phase; but I rather think of it as a quite mature way of seeing the world, one where I don't feel the need for a parent to keep an eye over me, and where I don't feel the need to be the overlording figure to someone else. I feel like I developed in a mature enough manner that I don't need to enact revenge on others for the overbearingness of my own parents (which they really weren't), and now try to be the important asshole with the most power on the block.

I'm still going all over the place here.

The book is called a "handbook for terrorism", but really it's a manifesto of sorts of how to live outside of the dominant society. It's in the same vein as Debord and company were writing about in the 1960's, and that Adorno was critiquing in his work; only it a move in another direction, knowing full well that the spectacle has an endless capacity to ingest dissent and make it part of itself. This book is a guide of trying to live on the fringes of the dissent and the importance of staying ahead of the powers that be if one doesn't want to just be safely co-opted. The terrorist aspects I'm guessing are towards the end, where they advocate learning how to fight, how to use weapons, and to arm oneself; because only by being armed can one then be a pacifist by refusing to use the weapons.

Of course I'm just a consumer of this book. But it's still pretty inspiring.

Ah, the reservations, I almost forgot this. The publisher of this book advocated the stealing of the book from bookstores, and staged a 'reading' (takeover?) at the store I work in that was guerrilla style. Of course they sent out press releases and alerted the media, and really only served to make a spectacle out of it all, and piss off employees at the store who they were kind of assholes to. Congrats Semiotext, and MIT for being exactly like what this book is railing against, a media event that is pushing a commodity, getting free publicity for your product that you will be paid for, no matter if the reader pays for or steals your book; and to boot you've been just like some entitled asshole and pissed on the people who work a job for very little money. Fuck you.

Rating Containing Books The Coming Insurrection
Ratings: 3.76 From 2311 Users | 220 Reviews

Weigh Up Containing Books The Coming Insurrection
If you stapled together four hundred deeply cynical French fortune cookie fortunes, you might end up with something like this tripe, which relies on slogans, speculation, and some oddly translated half-logic that probably sounds better after a few snifters of Calvados.

I love a good revolutionary polemic and The Coming Insurrection certainly fits the bill with its fierce rejection of mainstream Left political solutions and its cry for revolutionary anarcho-communalist insurrection. There are several incisive critiques leveled in this text  though they don't really break much new ground if you've mixed a bit of the anarchist canon in with your Adorno, Marcuse, Foucault, Debord, and etc. The Coming Insurrection is at its best when critiquing the way in which

The Invisible Committee, many of whom attained a larger than expected public profile as the Tarnac 9 when the French Government charged plotting to blow up train lines, mount a powerful argument to stop waiting for social change for the better and start making it. One of the things commentators on this manifesto are prone to say is that this book was a key part of the evidence in the unsuccessful prosecution of the Tarnac 9 (this statement is also made at the outset of this edition); all this

Lacking cohesion in terms of ideas regarding organization and action, and the ideal of the commune put forth lacks sustainability beyond the implementation described within. Points for the stylistic prose and anti-cop sentiment.

This book, this treatise, does what other political treatises try to do, but more effectively and without so much of the atroprop.The invisible comittee very fluently translates our world and recent history into words which may reach not just the ones who already know about these conditions and coming insurrection, but also to those who may wonder a bit at what is happening around them and what they can do to help hasten the fall of the authority.While I didn't understand a lot of the references

This essay is more a poetic indictment of post-industrial civilization than an advocation of a coherent political program. As poetic indictment of contemporary living it's very elegant and astute; as political program -- insofar as its rather romantic elaboration of communes could be said to constitute one -- it's suggestive at best, naive at worst. (Anyone remember running into all those books from the '70s detailing the train wrecks that became of many a 1960s' commune??)If it's true that the

CIf this book had been a 5 page article or a zine I would have enjoyed it. As it is i got about 4/5 pages worth of information from 60 pages of book. I learned just about nothing new in terms of theory or praxis, other than that insurrectionists fucking love to wax poetical. I'm not saying there's nothing useful here, or that insurrectionism has no place, but wading through 60 pages to get "don't fight the cops head on" and "decisions make themselves given enough information" is just not worth